[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] compiler bug
From: |
Chris Hanson |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] compiler bug |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:42:56 -0700 |
Thanks. So far it's looking like my last commit, but I'll know in an
hour or so.
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Joe Marshall <address@hidden> wrote:
> If there's anything I can help with, let me know.
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Chris Hanson <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Not yet. I've had trouble because some of the commits are broken and
>> require patching. Also, I got sloppy late last night so I have to
>> re-do some of the tests. I just semi-automated the testing process
>> and made a more careful log of the known results. I should have
>> something in a few hours.
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Joe Marshall <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Any luck?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Chris Hanson <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Not sure about that. I'm doing the bisection now. The bug isn't
>>>> present in commit 745a16218a43692d2c9ecdad72d1bab73fab0522 from Sept.
>>>> 7, so it's pretty recent.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Joe Marshall <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Chris Hanson <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> FYI, while testing my most recent changes, I ran across a recent
>>>>>> compiler bug. To reproduce: using the current compiler, do a fresh
>>>>>> compile from sources. Then use that compiler to do another fresh
>>>>>> compile. The second compilation hangs during the compilation of
>>>>>> "cref/anfile" (the very first file to compile). The problem appears
>>>>>> to be that the compiler is running map over a list of items, but that
>>>>>> the list is circular.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any indication of what sort of items are in the list?
>>>>> Any idea of which procedure is being compiled?
>>>>> What compiler phase?
>>>>>
>>>>> I fixed a bug in SF that was preventing things like
>>>>> ((access vector-ref system-global-environment) ....)
>>>>> from being optimized. I tested it pretty well on a second and
>>>>> third generation syntaxing of itself, but maybe it created some
>>>>> scode that works for the interpreter, but isn't quite kosher
>>>>> for the compiler.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> ~jrm
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ~jrm
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ~jrm
>
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] compiler bug, (continued)
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] compiler bug, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/18
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] compiler bug, Joe Marshall, 2009/09/18