mit-scheme-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VA


From: Chris Hanson
Subject: Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] improving integration of VALUES and CALL-WITH-VALUES
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:49:03 -0700

I don't understand how you concluded that the reordering algorithm
won't do anything.

In any case, I am ambivalent about the approach taken.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden> wrote:
> Any preference now about which transformation to commit, between the
> conservative and aggressive options?
>
> Closer inspection of LIAR's subproblem ordering suggests that in
> programs that the transformations are applicable to, LIAR wouldn't do
> anything interesting anyway, since it wouldn't recognize the programs
> as cases in which it can find any better ordering of subproblems than
> a random one (i.e. right-to-left).  So I'm inclined to commit the more
> aggressive one, partially just because it's a little easier to
> understand the code, to which I can add the more detailed comment.
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]