[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] FFI and KyotoCabinet
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] FFI and KyotoCabinet |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:13:28 -0700 |
> From: address@hidden (Matt Birkholz)
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:01:56 -0700
>
> [...]
>
> Is a quick skim of the commit message not effective?
A quick skim shows a couple under-related changes. I deleted the old
example FFI,
doc/ffi/ffi.texinfo
doc/user-manual/user.texinfo
src/ffi/prhello.scm
src/ffi/prhello.cdecl
added some procedures to runtime/ffi.scm
src/runtime/ffi.scm
src/runtime/runtime.pkg
and a couple fixes to the existing test framework.
tests/Clean.sh
tests/check.scm
That's 8 of 26 files that might have been hacked in separate commits.
Mea culpa. I will try to do better.