[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] FFI and KyotoCabinet
From: |
Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] FFI and KyotoCabinet |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:56:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/9.1 |
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:01:56 -0700
From: address@hidden (Matt Birkholz)
I am trying to make commits that build. Sometimes they can be small.
Sometimes they create an entire FFI generator, or a test for said FFI
generator *with* build support. I suppose I could have implemented
the build support before the test, even split the test library from
the actual test,... but none of that would help me produce something
that works. How would I test the building of FFIS without one?
Fair enough. I suppose another advantage to rebasing over merging is
that the commits don't get scattered into the history where it's hard
to find them. Personally I prefer to make independent commits
separately, even if that means committing something that nothing uses
yet -- `Implement BAR in preparation for FOO.'