[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports.
From: |
Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports. |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:51:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/9.1 |
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 03:10:22 +0000
From: Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden>
Anyway, all this is half-baked -- it needs to be implemented and used
experimentally to make sure it actually works well in practice. It
may turn out in practice that everything I've been rambling about is a
net lose over using ports as currently designed.
The real test for whether we have solidly engineered a general-purpose
composable I/O system is whether we can easily reimplement socat, and
supply reasonable proofs, or at least sketches of proofs, that our
reimplementation has fewer buffer overflows and memory leaks...
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] pclsr, Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/22
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] pclsr, Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/22
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] pclsr, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/22
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/22
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/22
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/23
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Arthur A. Gleckler, 2011/06/23
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/23
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/23
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/23
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports.,
Taylor R Campbell <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Matt Birkholz, 2011/06/25
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Faster ports., Taylor R Campbell, 2011/06/25