[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem? |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:57:13 -0700 |
> From: Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 01:04:39 +0000
>
> [...]
>
> Chris recently changed Scheme to preserve the floating-point
> environment across band save/restore, but floating-point environment
> objects are OS-dependent.
They are stored in every suspended thread's floating-point-
environment slot. We cannot restore a band with suspended threads
anymore? Not unless an fenv_t is identical (in size AND meaning) on
both host (dumper) and target (restorer)?
Actually, I can roll with that. If we ship runtime/*.com, the
installer can spin up an all.com optimized for the hardware on which
it is installed. Despite the lost portabimini, many machines will
still be able to swap bands... no?
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Joe Marshall, 2011/11/04
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Chris Hanson, 2011/11/06
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Huston Bokinsky, 2011/11/06
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/11/07
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?,
Matt Birkholz <=
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Chris Hanson, 2011/11/08
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Huston Bokinsky, 2011/11/08
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Matt Birkholz, 2011/11/08
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Chris Hanson, 2011/11/09
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Matt Birkholz, 2011/11/08
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] scheme/edwin build problem?, Taylor R Campbell, 2011/11/08