[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] R7RS and values.

From: Taylor R Campbell
Subject: Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] R7RS and values.
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 00:42:41 +0000

   Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 00:16:21 +0000
   From: Taylor R Campbell <address@hidden>

      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:56:03 -0700
      From: Matt Birkholz <address@hidden>

      I do not have SVM builds working yet, but I don't expect that will be
      a problem.  Is tools/patch.scm a problem?  Too kludgerrific?  How
      SHOULD I train a 9.2 build host?

   I don't understand what tools/patch.scm is needed for.  The whole
   point of building the tools is to run SF and the compiler as ordinary
   programs unaffected by changes in the host.

I suspect this is a symptom of the `temporary kludge for 9.2' where we
bogusly bake the target runtime into the cross-compiler toolchain.
Now that 9.2 is out, we can remove that temporary kludge, and you
should no longer need any of this bollocks with patching the host's

Try merging master into your branch and omitting the patch business?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]