[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Blowfish, MD5, mcrypt, mhash
From: |
Matt Birkholz |
Subject: |
Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Blowfish, MD5, mcrypt, mhash |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Nov 2017 09:15:37 -0700 |
On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 01:32 +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
> We definitely shouldn't advertise Blowfish as `one of the faster
> block ciphers'
I laughed at that too. Feel free to fix.
> I polled mit-scheme-users for who uses these and for what. Anyone
> here have thoughts on this? I'm volunteering to do the work to
> provide drop-in MD5 and Blowfish code replacements in microcode/, and
> get rid of the rest if nobody objects.
I would be happy to wrap a modern library if someone were to suggest
one. I'm just trying to kill microcode modules. Nicer plug-ins with
documentation, replacing all of the old modules, is just part of that
campaign. Wrapping more desirable libraries could also be a part.
A native Scheme implementation would be cool too, though I reserve my
powder for libraries that do IO. I can't stand a library that blocks
my world.
- [MIT-Scheme-devel] Blowfish, MD5, mcrypt, mhash, Taylor R Campbell, 2017/11/02
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Blowfish, MD5, mcrypt, mhash, Arthur A. Gleckler, 2017/11/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Blowfish, MD5, mcrypt, mhash, Taylor R Campbell, 2017/11/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Blowfish, MD5, mcrypt, mhash, Arthur A. Gleckler, 2017/11/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Blowfish, MD5, mcrypt, mhash, Chris Hanson, 2017/11/03
- Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] Blowfish, MD5, mcrypt, mhash,
Matt Birkholz <=