[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[MIT-Scheme-users] Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64
From: |
Taylor R Campbell |
Subject: |
[MIT-Scheme-users] Re: [MIT-Scheme-devel] MIT Scheme on the AMD x86-64 |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:15:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
IMAIL/1.21; Edwin/3.116; MIT-Scheme/7.7.90.+ |
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:47:04 -0800
From: Joe Marshall <address@hidden>
It seems to lack all floating point:
1 ]=> (/ 3.0 1.2)
;Hardware trap SIGILL
;To continue, call RESTART with an option number:
; (RESTART 1) => Return to read-eval-print level 1.
Does that work with the C back end? If not, it's a separate problem;
if it does, then it may just be an artefact of the vestiges of x87
code I left in x86-64.m4, which I plan to take out soon. You could
try adding `define(DISABLE_387,1)' to x86-64.m4 to test that
hypothesis.
Also, what operating system is this on?