Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: 2.01, servers.met and blacklists

[Martin]

Sven Hartge wrote...
> > Switch the option and then defining new filters??? This could be done
> > only by defining the filters...what do you need the option for then??
> > (talking again about over-engineering....?) 
> Umm, ok ;)
> You are right.

But we surely need to do something about this:
me:~/mldonkey # cat servers.ini | grep -c server_addr
463
me:~/mldonkey # cat servers.ini | grep -c \"127.
153
me:~/mldonkey # cat downloads.ini | grep -A21 server_bla
 server_black_list = [
  "127.255.255.255";
  "172.16.255.255";
  "172.17.255.255";
  "172.18.255.255";
  "172.19.255.255";
  "172.20.255.255";
  "172.21.255.255";
  "172.22.255.255";
  "172.23.255.255";
  "172.24.255.255";
  "172.25.255.255";
  "172.26.255.255";
  "172.27.255.255";
  "172.28.255.255";
  "172.29.255.255";
  "172.30.255.255";
  "172.31.255.255";
  "172.32.255.255";
  "192.168.255.255";
  "10.255.255.255"]

Theres no way im gonna put *all* local adresses in there....this would
decreace performance period!

-- 
Before replying see www.reedmedia.net/misc/mail/using-mailing-list.html
And he disappeared in a puff of logic.