[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CPU usage configuration report in cervlet
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: CPU usage configuration report in cervlet |
Date: |
29 Nov 2002 23:21:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) |
Martin Pala <address@hidden> writes:
> I have three little issues:
>
> 1.) *
> What tabout to synchronize it? I think it will be better to not report
> actual cycles count, so cervlet will give:
>
>
> CPU usage limit If greater than 2.0% for 5 cycle(s) then alert
Agree
> 2.) what about making start+stop programs in passive mode optional?
> Currently if they aren't defined, monit won't monitor the service. I
> think it will be usefull to allow passive mode monitoring live without
> start+stop definition. It will be needed also to print information in
> the case that star/stop program wasn't defined in cervlet and
> terminal mode if user will try to start/stop process via monit's httpd
> or by "monit start".
The start/stop programs have always been optional, unless I have
missed something checked in lately!? If they are not optional I, of
course, vote for them to become optional again.
> 3.) Last question is regarded to cevlet and terminal process
> information order - what about to move mailinglist information to the
> end of process info? If you few contacts, important informations such
> as protocol test are at the end of the list, which as maybe not
> good. I think that we should move all these informations above process
> mailing list, so we can have for example:
Agree again :)
You fix?
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland