Re: preparing for release? - example correction

[rory]

>>
> Yeah, your argues are good and it makes sense to use your present
> version (it needs at least fewer statements in the case that there are
> more processes dependant on one process as you described), so we should
>  maybe stay with it as it is. Only one thing still resides in my head -
>  at first sight i present 'depend name' statement as 'depend on name'
> (it  is the cause why i asked it for). English is not my native
> language so  maybe to the other people it makes no problem. In the case
> that it can  cause mistake on first use for other people too, we shall
> maybe change  the dictionary to be more transparent. What about it?
>

I wouldn't mind changing the name, I just couldn't think of something good.