Re: preparing for release?

[rory]

> Christian Hopp <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Martin Pala wrote:
>>
>> > I agree with Rory - if we will use 3.5, it will raise question,
>> > where is 3.[1-4] so it could be better to release it as 4.0. On the
>> > other side i like better slower versioning so even though we have
>> > lot of new functionality, i'm +1 to release it as 3.1.
>>
>> I would prefer 3.1, too (+1).
>
> We are a democratic project so 3.1 it is :-)
>

Shouldn't we be calling this monit XP, monit X, or monit 2000?

> --
> Jan-Henrik Haukeland
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> monit-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev