[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: depend take 2
From: |
Rory Toma |
Subject: |
Re: depend take 2 |
Date: |
17 Dec 2002 13:02:23 -0800 |
What do you mean by "not as expected" - in case it's how I expect it to
work. 8-)
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 12:40, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
> Hmm, the depend functionality is much better but still does not work
> as expected. I'm going to work a bit with on it. In case anyone are
> planning doing stuff with changing control.c let me know.
--
Rory Toma address@hidden
VP of Run Level 5 http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital http://www.digeo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/17
- Re: depend take 2,
Rory Toma <=
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/17
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/17
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/17
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/17
- RE: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/17
- RE: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/17
- Re: depend take 2, Martin Pala, 2002/12/18
- Re: depend take 2, Martin Pala, 2002/12/18
- Re: depend take 2, Martin Pala, 2002/12/18
- Re: depend take 2, rory, 2002/12/18