Re: depend take 2

[rory]

>
> Laying it out like that I can see your point. It *does* look more
> logical, maybe what was confusing me a bit was the name of the
> statement, that is, "depend", in your case the keyword should probably
> be "dependant" which makes it more clear. What do you say Rory?
>
> --

We can change it to dependant. I probably won't be able to do anything
until the new year, as I'm leaving on vacation early.