[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: depend take 2
From: |
Rory Toma |
Subject: |
Re: depend take 2 |
Date: |
19 Dec 2002 16:22:40 -0800 |
I have a question for discussion. It seems that the two issues with the
previous code were:
flipping the "depend" statement order
suspending control time
I think I can easily fix those 2 in the old code. However, there are
some things I like in the new code. However, there seems to be more
duplicate code in the new code. In the old code, I was trying to have
all of the logic in check_process, and make everything pass thru that
before it was stopped or started. This would make it much simpler to
update for 4.0 when we add external sources.
When I get back from vacation (or tomorrow if I finish some snmp stuff)
I'd like to consolidate some of the new code. Either that or we discuss
what we want, revert and refactor again.
--
Rory Toma address@hidden
VP of Run Level 5 http://www.trs80.net
Digeo Digital http://www.digeo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: depend take 2, (continued)
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Christian Hopp, 2002/12/21
- Re: depend take 2, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/12/20
- Re: depend take 2, Rory Toma, 2002/12/19
- Re: depend take 2,
Rory Toma <=