[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "monit stop" and "monit restart" too dangerous?
From: |
Oliver Jehle |
Subject: |
Re: "monit stop" and "monit restart" too dangerous? |
Date: |
30 Jan 2003 12:57:49 +0100 |
sounds good...
but i think, to have it easy in scripts to use the monit command, the
set forceactions=[yes|no] option in monitrc is mandatory....
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 12:30, Christian Hopp wrote:
> Hi!
>
> My be I am just a puny coward, but I think there should be at least a
> little bit of protection.
>
> a) monit [stop|start|restart] all
>
> b) monit [stop|start|restart]
> Are you sure that you want to [stop|start|restart] all services?
>
> or without question with "monit -f [stop|start|restart]"
>
> or without question with "set forceactions=[yes|no]" in monitrc
>
>
> With lead helmet and x-ray protection glasses in front of the computer,
>
> Christian
>
- "monit stop" and "monit restart" too dangerous?, Christian Hopp, 2003/01/30
- Re: "monit stop" and "monit restart" too dangerous?,
Oliver Jehle <=
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, rory, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Martin Pala, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Christian Hopp, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Martin Pala, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Rory Toma, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/01/30