[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: monit socket.c
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: monit socket.c |
Date: |
17 Jun 2003 18:51:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) |
Christian Hopp <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
>
> > Christian Hopp <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > I'd like to commit in the no-reserved-words patch. Do you have any
> > > pending changes?
> >
> > No, I'm planning on programming into the wee-hours soon, but haven't
> > started yet. BTW, what is the no-reserved-words patch ?
>
> description is in... Subject: Language Task Force Report I
> You can define any kind of service name even though it is a reserved
> word.
I don't know how, but I missed that mail. Anyway I read it now in the
archive. Yes, this looks clever! except, please can you add a lexer
rule to make old check statements also work on the form:
'check apache with pidfile'
So the backward compability does not break.
> The problem is it is quite a pain to resolve always the conflicts
> with your sync. (-:
Hehe, well the process->service change was big and included other
goodies as well. But it had to be done. Hopefully my next sync will be
smaller. So, hurry to check-in before I start my next sync wave :)
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland