[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFD: C style
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: RFD: C style |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:28:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) |
Michael Shigorin <address@hidden> writes:
> (Ruby, for the most part) -- seems it's Linux style as it's quite
> concise on lines and not too dense on columns, not letting you do
> dozens of nests to really overcomlicate particular piece of code.
Yes, 8 space tabs forces you away from the large banana shape and is
easier to read. (I think I read someplace that Linus would not accept
code with more than three level of indentations because it's (often) a
sign of a design flaw). On the other hand, thight code is *cool*
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- Re: event engine patch update, (continued)
- Re: event engine patch update, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2004/03/24
- Re: event engine patch update, Martin Pala, 2004/03/24
- Re: event engine patch update, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2004/03/27
- Re: event engine patch update, Martin Pala, 2004/03/28
- Re: event engine patch update - updated picture, Martin Pala, 2004/03/28
- Re: event engine patch update, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2004/03/28
- Re: event engine patch update, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2004/03/28
- Re: event engine patch update, Martin Pala, 2004/03/28
- RFD: C style [was Re: event engine patch update], Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2004/03/28
- Re: RFD: C style [was Re: event engine patch update], Michael Shigorin, 2004/03/29
- Re: RFD: C style,
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <=
- Re: RFD: C style [was Re: event engine patch update], Christian Hopp, 2004/03/29
- Re: RFD: C style, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2004/03/29
- Re: RFD: C style, Michael Shigorin, 2004/03/29
- Re: RFD: C style, Martin Pala, 2004/03/29