proposed changes to the alert statement

[Jan-Henrik Haukeland]

I just browsed through the doc and saw these statements;

(1)  if failed .. then alert
(2)  alert address@hidden

It hit me that it would be more elegant to append the standalone  
alert statement in (2) directly to alert in (1). That is,

  if failed .. then alert address@hidden

In other words I suggest that we change the alert action statement to  
this,

 ALERT address@hidden [,address@hidden, address@hidden

What do you think?

--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
Mobil +47 97141255

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature