[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]
From: |
Tomas Fasth |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED] |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:29:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nathaniel, Eric,
Nathaniel Smith skrev:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 07:36:19PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 07:42:46PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>>
>>>Any chance for a .deb for sarge? sarge is stable enough for a server
>>>that contains precious files, and unstable is, well, unstable.
>>
>>Sure, if anyone wants to build it, or give me a pointer to an easy way
>>to set up a sarge chroot...
>
> So, Eric Anderson sent me a sarge .deb (thanks!). It is also named
> "monotone_0.22-0.1_i386.deb". The easy problem is that I can't have
> two files named this in the download directory; okay, rename the file
> so it has "sarge" in it or something. Harder question: is it okay to
> distribute two distinct packages with the exact same version number?
> What's the right way to do this sort of thing?
In general a backport to sarge (the current stable) should decrement
the last digit by one and add "sarge1". A consecutive update should
increment to "sarge2".
Example: "monotone_0.22-0.0sarge1_i386.deb".
I have a clean build environment for sarge (using pbuilder), so if
you like I can provide a backport right after I have done the
official upload to Debian unstable.
- --
Tomas Fasth <address@hidden>
GnuPG Fingerprint: DC7B 9453 7F26 1BF9 6B21 9F90 C187 7355 9FE8 D504
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDAIqiwYdzVZ/o1QQRAnVKAJ9aALxlFyawBy7dCxQU5zmXAUzvCQCfU67W
HePPyFW2juPUN1v+8PtKinE=
=+aG8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED], Nathaniel Smith, 2005/08/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED], Hendrik Boom, 2005/08/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED], Nathaniel Smith, 2005/08/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED], Nathaniel Smith, 2005/08/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED],
Tomas Fasth <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED], Hendrik Boom, 2005/08/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED], Tomas Fasth, 2005/08/15
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [Fwd: monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED], Nathaniel Smith, 2005/08/15
Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED, Richard Levitte, 2005/08/16
Re: [Monotone-devel] monotone_0.22-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED, Hendrik Boom, 2005/08/16