[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] rfc on h: selector behavior
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] rfc on h: selector behavior |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:44:03 +0200 (CEST) |
In message <address@hidden> on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:15:41 -0700, Emile Snyder
<address@hidden> said:
emile> [...] Also, that it's not clear whether h:* should mean
emile>
emile> erase_ancestors(b:*)
emile> or
emile> union (erase_ancestors(b:b1), erase_ancestors(b:b2), ...)
emile>
emile> Any opinions?
Actually, this transends to any globbing pattern. After all, does
h:com.circus.* mean `erase_ancestors(b:com.circus.*' or
`union(erase_ancestors(b:com.circus.b1),
erase_ancestors(b:com.circus.b2), ...)'?
Tough question, and I'm not sure I've the answer...
Cheers,
Richard
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
[Monotone-devel] Re: rfc on h: selector behavior, Wim Oudshoorn, 2005/10/13