[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Delta storage
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Delta storage |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:18:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Zbynek Winkler <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Given a revision B and C does it matter if you say "we store B->C" or
> "B<-C"? In both cases once you have one of the revisions you can
> reconstruct the other. No? The only difference would be where it
> starts...
Not all deltas are reversible. If the delta B->C says "delete lines
38-57", then that doesn't let you construct the delta C->B. (monotone
stores binary deltas of the xdelta form, I believe, but I think the
same sort of thing can happen in those.)
[...]
- Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server" support for monotone, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server" support for monotone, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/10/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server" support for monotone, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server" support for monotone, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/10/12
- Delta storage (was Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server"...), Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/14
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Delta storage,
Bruce Stephens <=
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Delta storage, Lapo Luchini, 2005/10/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Delta storage, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Delta storage, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/10/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server" support for monotone, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server" support for monotone, Nathaniel Smith, 2005/10/14
- Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server" support for monotone, Zbynek Winkler, 2005/10/14
Re: [Monotone-devel] announcing preliminary "dumb server" support for monotone, Matthew Gregan, 2005/10/12