[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Is l10n a little off?
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Is l10n a little off? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jan 2006 05:36:56 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:16:40PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> Heh, on the other hand, the same thing usually happens to the
> translators as well, and I guess the worst is when you end up with a
> bunch of fuzzy entries. Other than that, I don't really see the harm,
> but being new at this, it would probably be good to hear from those
> that have done this for a little longer...
I _think_ the point is that they want to merge in new translations at
a time that they choose, rather than having it just happen (possibly
creating a bunch of spurious conflicts on their end)?
> njs> How POTFILES.in is supposed to work also confuses me. intltool-update
> njs> --maintain says it can't find any missing files, so I've sort of been
> njs> hoping that things will just work out somehow. Or at least figuring
> njs> that if there really is a problem, it can wait until a translator
> njs> finds strings missing.
>
> OK, I guess my next thing will be to look at the source, because I
> just can't understand what selection criteria it uses. For example,
> there are a number of F() used in safe_map.hh, but that one isn't
> anywhere in POTFILES*...
I looked at the source. It's hardcoded to check for _().
I'm getting the feeling this all isn't the most elegant or polished
toolset :-(.
-- Nathaniel
--
"But in Middle-earth, the distinct accusative case disappeared from
the speech of the Noldor (such things happen when you are busy
fighting Orcs, Balrogs, and Dragons)."