[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited...
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited... |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:03:07 +0100 (CET) |
In message <address@hidden> on Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:25:27 +1100, Daniel Carosone
<address@hidden> said:
dan> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:39:02PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
dan> > Yeah, the only problem, as far as I see it, is that approve takes
dan> > --branch, so for example, I could very easily say something like:
dan> >
dan> > monotone approve --branch=net.venge.monotone.approved.linux \
dan> > 6e87084a87413eed2c31100054ff8d5045f0be4d
dan> >
dan> > If that gets repeated a few, do you know what kind of graph that
dan> > branch (which I invented on the spot) would have?
dan>
dan> There's nothing whatsoever intrinsically wrong with a
dan> disconnected branch, so long as the users of that branch have
dan> appropriate expectations.
I did a little bit of experiment, and found out that I had
misunderstood what the heads of a branch with a disconnected graph
would be. That was basically my worry with this scheme.
My mantra for the night: experiment a little first, ask questions later.
Cheers,
Richard
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis
Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Nathaniel Smith, 2006/02/11
Re: [Monotone-devel] Approval revisited..., Nathaniel Smith, 2006/02/11
[Monotone-devel] Re: Approval revisited..., Bruce Stephens, 2006/02/12