[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again)
From: |
Daniel THOMPSON |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again) |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Mar 2006 10:19:32 +0000 |
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 20:43 -0600, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> > -- "mtn" -- the boring, generic choice. Of course, sometimes boring
> > is good.
>
> It's also what I use, so it's clearly superior. :p
I agree, although not for this reason.
I never found typing monotone to be too much of an issue, however of the
abbreviations I think mtn has the very clear advantage over things like
moto being much easy for a touch typist to since oscillates between the
hands.
--
Daniel Thompson (STMicroelectronics) <address@hidden>
1000 Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4SQ. 01454 462659
If a car is a horseless carriage then is a motorcycle a horseless horse?
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Shaun Jackman, 2006/03/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Matthew A. Nicholson, 2006/03/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Julio M. Merino Vidal, 2006/03/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), hendrik, 2006/03/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Matt Johnston, 2006/03/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Timothy Brownawell, 2006/03/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again),
Daniel THOMPSON <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/03/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Emile Snyder, 2006/03/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] renaming monotone executable (again), Nuno Lucas, 2006/03/04