[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs
From: |
Jack Lloyd |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:42:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 05:24:08PM -0700, Graydon Hoare wrote:
> It's easy enough to start with the "all zero" SHA1 and count upwards.
> It's probably even fine if you just run through the first 2^64 of them
> for now; you can't store anywhere near that much data in an sqlite
> database.
Sounds to me like IDs need a unique namespace for "this bitstring
generated by algorithm X" (X = sha1,random,counter,sha256,...)
</my2cents>
- [Monotone-devel] RFC: Fake IDs, Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/18
- [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Graydon Hoare, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs,
Jack Lloyd <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Jack Lloyd, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Ethan Blanton, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Jack Lloyd, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Zack Weinberg, 2006/07/19
- [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Graydon Hoare, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: RFC: Fake IDs, Daniel Carosone, 2006/07/19