[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconvenience
From: |
Daniel Carosone |
Subject: |
Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)) |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Sep 2006 21:21:58 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 09:12:14PM +1000, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> > Or even better: use the manifest to store that information...
>
> That's exactly how attr's are stored
It's how attr's are represented.
I had deliberately omitted mentioning the 'minor' detail that
manifests are actually *stored* as parts of rosters, but I had to go
and use the word "stored" there rather than "represented".
So, having foolishly misrepresented rosters, I'm sure njs or someone
else will correct me if I don't clarify this first.
--
Dan.
pgpOSqwkD45Lz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Christof Petig, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Christof Petig, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)),
Daniel Carosone <=
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Christof Petig, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/08
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Markus Schiltknecht, 2006/09/09
- Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Thomas Moschny, 2006/09/08
Re: cvssync (was Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: big repositories inconveniences (partial pull?)), Daniel Carosone, 2006/09/08