|
From: | Jon Bright |
Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] Error handling via automate |
Date: | Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:20:52 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) |
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
(In fact 'automate stdio' makes me quite nervous for this reason already. I would feel better if part of its contract was that it would exit after an error, and it was the client's responsibility to restart it.)
Speaking as someone who's writing something to use automate, I wouldn't have a problem with this strategy. automate stdio optimises for repeated strings of commands. Restarting the process isn't optimal, but it doesn't seem like it's a huge cost in the case of an error.
-- Jon Bright Silicon Circus Ltd. http://www.siliconcircus.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |