[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: po/ChangeLog
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: po/ChangeLog |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Sep 2006 10:03:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:17:04AM -0500, Timothy Brownawell wrote:
> I'd almost think so too, but any output massaging probably wouldn't be
> entirely portable. Then there's also the issue of, what if you don't
> want every single rev to get a changelog entry? Things like translation
> updates, or feature branches that should have one entry at the end when
> they're merged, rather than 10 "implemented X" and 50 "checkpoint;
> 243/371 tests pass now" entries.
log --exclude po --stay-on-branch ?
-- Nathaniel
--
"But suppose I am not willing to claim that. For in fact pianos
are heavy, and very few persons can carry a piano all by themselves."