[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch
From: |
Thomas Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:14:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20060911) |
Thomas Keller schrieb:
> Zack Weinberg schrieb:
>> And third ... what I actually *want* update to do in that circumstance
>> is update to the head of the branch that *would* be in _MTN/options if
>> I hadn't gone and munged it. I do this when I have set up a working
>> copy but then not had time to make any actual changes, so it's silly
>> not to be working off the latest revision in n.v.m. I can force an
>> update with -rh:n.v.m but then I have to go munge _MTN/options again.
>
> Agreed, I stumbled upon this a few times as well... what if mtn branch
> then adds another "new_branch" option into _MTN/option, so that update
> and revert still work in the current, uncommitted workspace?
>
> mtn revert would remove this new_branch option and mtn commit would use
> new_branch instead of branch, and, on a successful commit, would write
> new_branch into branch and remove new_branch as well.
>
> I'm still not persuaded if mtn branch (with any option supplied) should
> actually update anything. If you don't like "branch" as command for what
> it does currently, I'm open for renaming it (f.e. to set_branch or
> something alike). What do other people think about this?
It has been very quite on this topic and my branch is still unfinished.
Anyone want to give me a "Go!" into a certain direction?
Thomas.
--
ICQ: 85945241 | SIP: 1-747-027-0392 | http://www.thomaskeller.biz
> Guitone, a frontend for monotone: http://guitone.thomaskeller.biz
> Music lyrics and more: http://musicmademe.com
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Derek Scherger, 2007/03/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Thomas Keller, 2007/03/08
- [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Bruce Stephens, 2007/03/08
- [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Steven E. Harris, 2007/03/08
- [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Bruce Stephens, 2007/03/08
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Nathaniel Smith, 2007/03/08
- [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Bruce Stephens, 2007/03/08
- [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Steven E. Harris, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Zack Weinberg, 2007/03/09
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch, Thomas Keller, 2007/03/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [PATCH] mtn commit without -b and mtn branch,
Thomas Keller <=