[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:55:37 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:17:44AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> That's a good sign. Unfortunately I cannot reproduce it myself - on
> the aforementioned beefy amd64 box, I'm seeing a very small but
> consistent slowdown on the same test (4m20 before, 4m21 after).
> oprofile is not cooperating with me (zero samples recorded, no matter
> what I do), so I don't know why.
Try 'opcontrol --status' -- this always happens to me, and it usually
means that opcontrol has decided to remember some random weird setting
that I had used once, and keep it forever.
-- Nathaniel
--
Details are all that matters; God dwells there, and you never get to
see Him if you don't struggle to get them right. -- Stephen Jay Gould
- [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path, Zack Weinberg, 2007/06/21
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path, Derek Scherger, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path, Zack Weinberg, 2007/06/22
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path,
Nathaniel Smith <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path, Derek Scherger, 2007/06/23
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path, Timothy Brownawell, 2007/06/23
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path, Zack Weinberg, 2007/06/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path, Timothy Brownawell, 2007/06/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Call for testing: nvm.experiment.no-split-path, Zack Weinberg, 2007/06/27