[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone
From: |
Markus Schiltknecht |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:14:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080109) |
Hi,
Thomas Moschny wrote:
Every cert should probably carry an 'author' and a 'date' field. Note that
author and signer can be different.
Uh.. why would you want to merge in a date field?
Maybe one also wants to have a message' field, but I'm not sure what the use
case would be, and we surely don't want to continue that ad infinitum (msg
for the msg for the msg...).
I'd vote against such a message field, exactly for the "ad infinitum"
reason.
This would leave us with currently four pre-defined cert types: 'commit'
resp. 'commit-message', 'branch', 'tag' and 'suspend'.
Hm.. having the date information merged into these certs would lead to
duplicates for normal commits.
Instead of trying to merge those certs together, I'd rather try to
increase locality of those certs in the database as well as during
netsync. That way, all certs would benefit, instead of only those which
might possibly be used together.
Just my 2c. Other thoughts?
Markus
Re: [Monotone-devel] Future of monotone, Brian May, 2008/01/28
[Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Graydon Hoare, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone,
Markus Schiltknecht <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Bruce Stephens, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Markus Schiltknecht, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Future of monotone, Thomas Moschny, 2008/01/28
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Re: Future of monotone, Pavel Cahyna, 2008/01/28