|
From: | Thomas Keller |
Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: summit flag day? |
Date: | Thu, 24 Apr 2008 10:50:13 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) |
Markus Schiltknecht schrieb:
Hi, Richard Levitte wrote:The only thing that I see might need a flag day of all those things is this mega-cert change, which I'm not sure is needed, relatively speaking.(Assuming we want atomic certs) I'm thinking about splitting that task up into two: one is the internal change of the storage format: instead of saving multiple certs per revision - each in a row in revision_certs - we collect them together and save them in one single blob / row per revision. That could be done without requiring a flag day or anything. Netsync as well as signing and verifying would work as before.
I'd keep revision_certs as a "local cache" of cert blobs which are stored elsewhere (revision_certs_blobs?!). Otherwise we'd have big problems with fast lookups of revisions via their certs (i.e. select).
Thomas. -- GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |