[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points |
Date: |
Sun, 16 May 2010 05:19:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (windows-nt) |
Thomas Keller <address@hidden> writes:
> For the others: If you think your branch is ready for the final merge,
> give me a note if you want to get it reviewed another time, otherwise
> just merge it.
For net.venge.monotone.bugfest-2010.13604-stephen_leake, I've removed
the --recursive option from 'undrop'. So I think this is ready to merge.
net.venge.monotone.restrictions.implicit-includes will change what
'revert' does with some restrictions; since 'undrop' shares core code
with 'revert', there's no need to wait for that branch.
--
-- Stephe
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points, Thomas Keller, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points, Derek Scherger, 2010/05/10
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points, Derek Scherger, 2010/05/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points, Thomas Keller, 2010/05/12
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points,
Stephen Leake <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points, Thomas Keller, 2010/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points, Derek Scherger, 2010/05/16
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points, Stephen Leake, 2010/05/17
- Re: [Monotone-devel] bugfest analysis - final points, Thomas Keller, 2010/05/17