[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] automate serve?
From: |
Thomas Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] automate serve? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:04:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; de; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
Am 26.09.10 16:36, schrieb Stephen Leake:
> In implementing the DVC front-end for automate sync, I've run into a
> problem.
>
> If I use ssh: or file: netsync schemes, the mtn process that is started
> outputs startup error messages that are not properly packetized for
> automate stdio. [...]
If you read over this again, how do you think would an automate version
of serve make any changes to this behaviour? The mtn instance that is
called would still use a completely different package stream (which must
not be intermixed with the packet stream of the parent process) and to
get _any_ kind of packeting there you'd anyways need to call it over
stdio there.
Or maybe I'm misunderstanding something... clear me up :)
Thomas.
--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature