[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1
From: |
Hendrik Boom |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1 |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:55:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
So what's the final decision on this problem? A change in the list of
other packages that have to be installed first? A change in the
dependencies in Debian's packages? (in which case I hope the necessary
bug report is on its way to Dexbian) A change in the -lcrypto link
option?
Let me know when it's time to try another install-from-source test on
this machine, starting from the same system configuration.
-- hendrik
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 03:43:32PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:28:56AM -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Hendrik Boom <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >> hendrik> conftest.cpp -lz -L/usr/lib -lm -lbz2 -lcrypto -lgmp -lpthread
> > >> -lrt -lz
> > >> hendrik> -lbotan >&5
> > >> hendrik> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrypto
> > >>
> > >> That's where the problem is...
> > >>
> > >> Quite honestly, though, I'm a bit surprised this should happen at
> > >> all. libbotan1.7 depends on libssl0.9.8, which delivers libcrypto...
> > >> So the question is, what's up with that?
> > >
> > > libssl10.9.8 provides libcrypto in
> > >
> > > /usr/lib/i486/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> > > /usr/lib/i586/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> > > /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> > > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> > >
> > > and all of these are present on my system.
> >
> > Is libssl-dev installed? Does the botan-dev package (whatever it's
> > actually named) depend on libssl-dev, as it seems it needs to?
>
> libssl-dev is not installed. Nor is in mentioned in
> monotone-0.99.1/INSTALL as something that should be installed.
>
> -- hendrik
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monotone-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monotone-devel
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, (continued)
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Zack Weinberg, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Markus Wanner, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Richard Levitte, 2011/01/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1, Hendrik Boom, 2011/01/03
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Not so minor problem in 0.99.1,
Hendrik Boom <=