[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nel] re: Boost library
|
From: |
Olivier Lejade |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nel] re: Boost library |
|
Date: |
Thu, 04 Jan 2001 19:15:31 +0100 |
At 06:54 PM 1/4/01 +0100, you wrote:
I think there is a misunderstanding. They exclude GPL and LGPL for
library SUBMITTED. They want more of a BSD kind I think.
Yes, this is what I noticed afterwards. :P
Hence my "maybe not" post.
Anyways, thanks for the clarification and now that the license issue is
cleared, rest assured we'll pay closer attentions to the libs.
I don't want to force you to use anything from boost, I just would want you
to dismiss it for bad reasons.
Arg, it wasn't my intent !
At first reading I just thought there was licensing compatibilities issues
that prevented the use of the libs for GPL/LGP programs. My bad: I was
wrong. But it sure would be nice to incorporate Boost stuff if we can !
Actually, Cyrille (3D Lead) went to school with one of the Boost guys... :)
- [Nel] Some comments from a new user (builder only for now), Nevrax, 2001/01/03
- Re: [Nel] Some comments from a new user (builder only for now), sameh chafik Pro, 2001/01/04
- Re: [Nel] Some comments from a new user (builder only for now), Olivier Lejade, 2001/01/04
- Re: [Nel] Some comments from a new user (builder only for now), Bernard Hugueney, 2001/01/04
- Re: [Nel] Some comments from a new user (builder only for now), Olivier Lejade, 2001/01/04
- [Nel] Boost.org, Olivier Lejade, 2001/01/04
- Re: [Nel] Boost.org, Olivier Lejade, 2001/01/04
- [Nel] re: Boost library, Bernard Hugueney, 2001/01/04
- Re: [Nel] re: Boost library,
Olivier Lejade <=
- Re: [Nel] re: Boost library, Vincent Archer, 2001/01/05
- Re: [Nel] re: Boost library, Vincent Archer, 2001/01/05
Re: [Nel] Some comments from a new user (builder only for now), Vianney Lecroart, 2001/01/04
Re: [Nel] Some comments from a new user (builder only for now), Valignat Cedric, 2001/01/09