Re: [Netsukuku-site] website update

[Masayuki Hatta]

Hi,

WordPress is perfectly fine.  I assume the address is
http://new.netrsukuku.org/.  Is there already any editing policy for
that site?(such as authorization).

Best regards,
MH

2011/8/27 Ruben Dias <address@hidden>:
> Greetings.
>
> I've been following this list for a while now, and I really believe I can 
> contribute something to netsukuku as a whole. Since there has not
> been much discussion about what to use, I would then say we go with wordpress 
> (after all, it's already in place), and move on forward from there. It might 
> not be perfect; but I believe it can work, at least for now.
>
> That's why, I would like to start working on it as soon as possible.
>
>
>
> On 7/31/2011 11:48 AM, Luca Dionisi wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> First, let's have a look at the results.
>> Many people have vowed they're willing to contribute. Many have
>> subscribed to this ml.
>> Very little discussions have been made on what we want and what we need to 
>> do.
>> Nothing at all (except the installation of wordpress site by the good
>> jaromil) has been done.
>>
>> I think we are in need of one person who takes the lead of the
>> (future) efforts on this side.
>> He has the power/responsibility to take a decision on the platform to
>> use, the layout of the site, the contents, and all.
>> I cannot be that person. I lack time and expertise on the field.
>>
>> I'd like to just reiterate my humble opinion about the priorities for
>> the website.
>> The primary target of the site is not people who want to know the
>> theory, investigate on possible improvements, compare to the
>> alternatives on routing protocols, look at the code or help with
>> it[1].
>> It's people who wants to try the software and connect to a network or
>> create a new one.
>> So, urgent things are:
>> 1. informative pages on how to install and how to use;
>> 2. tools that help to contact friendly people around me and coordinate
>> with them.
>> Whilst, not very urgent things are:
>> a. copying/updating content from the old website which deals with
>> theory and internal functioning of the program.
>>
>> In particular, for # 1, efforts are not urgent (we need to have the
>> program finished to describe how it is to be installed and used) and
>> anyway I think we should spend little effort on it. Indeed the program
>> should be very easy to install and just work out of the box.
>> Instead, # 2 has to be carefully thought and we should make all
>> efforts it will take to have very useful tools for anyone who might
>> have interest in making a community around him. He could be a geek, or
>> one who knows absolutely nothing on tcp/ip.
>>
>>
>> --Luca
>>
>> [1] These kind of people are extremely needed right now.
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Masayuki Hatta <mhatta at gmail.com>