Re: [Octal-dev] docs?

[David O'Toole]

> Yep, I got the PS file.  I like the way it's panning out, I'll have to wait
> for the first complete draft before I comment on the level of detail and
> such like.  As I haven't been paying full attention to the discussions going
> on here, I'm not sure what is meant by the concept of multiple tracks.

OOps, I forgot to add this to the last message:

There is no glossary as of yet in the docs, so some terms are left
undefined/vague for now. I have a printout of the docs with bright
orange hi-liter pen marking up all the undefined terms, and I'll fill in
the blanks ASAP. I'm just following the "release early, release often"
school of doc-writing :-). As of right now, the doc probably does not
make too much sense to anyone not intimately familiar with Buzz (because
while the implementation is different, I am using much of the same
terminology.) But this will be remedied soon, along with the C++ wrapper
for the API (a big diagram on my desk, ready to be coded) which will
make coding machines a bit simpler for the developer. 

Still cranking away...

-- 
@@@ david o'toole
@@@ address@hidden
@@@ www.gnu.org/software/octal