[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Octal-dev] The 95% solution
From: |
Dave O'Toole |
Subject: |
Re: [Octal-dev] The 95% solution |
Date: |
Sun, 28 May 2000 11:15:22 -0400 |
> Grepping the public-release alpha from March 28 turns up
> nothing, but it would appear to be under 1.5.4 in the spec,
> d'oh. Probably the figure in the introduction that got me.
Hmm. Well, I got one out of three right :-). I guess just ignore the
figure for now, I'll probably remove it from the next rev as it adds
nothing.
> Basically splitting the left and right channels and having
> two rows of identical effect machines. The pain of keeping
> the parameters in sync haunts me to this day.
Ick; given Buzz's difficulties with selecting/cutting/pasting, I don't
blame you!
--
@@@ david o'toole
@@@ address@hidden
@@@ www.gnu.org/software/octal
- Re: [Octal-dev] re: stereo machines + design question, (continued)
- Re: [Octal-dev] re: stereo machines + design question, Yannick Chapuis, 2000/05/24
- [Octal-dev] 0,1,infinity redux (yet again :-), Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/27
- Re: [Octal-dev] 0,1,infinity redux (yet again :-), Neil Nelson, 2000/05/27
- Re: [Octal-dev] 0,1,infinity redux (yet again :-), Ola Sverre Bauge, 2000/05/27
- [Octal-dev] The 95% solution, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/28
- Re: [Octal-dev] The 95% solution, Mitkin, 2000/05/28
- [Octal-dev] OFFTOPIC (mika vainio), Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/28
- Re: [Octal-dev] OFFTOPIC (mika vainio), Mitkin, 2000/05/28
- Re: [Octal-dev] The 95% solution, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/28
- Re: [Octal-dev] The 95% solution, Ola Sverre Bauge, 2000/05/28
- Re: [Octal-dev] The 95% solution,
Dave O'Toole <=
- Re: [Octal-dev] The 95% solution, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/28