[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41239] Dot notation for accessing Java static
From: |
Carnë Draug |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41239] Dot notation for accessing Java static class fields |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:42:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/30.0 Iceweasel/30.0 |
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #41239 (project octave):
Rik said:
> All sensible reasons. I'm not opposed to keeping around some
> version of javaGet/javaSet until there is a guaranteed working
> replacement.
Then can we please "un"deprecate jave_get and java_set now? Because some
working does not exist yet. What will I do if I release a package 2 months
before 4.2?
> After dot notation is available it would be wise to bring this
> issue back to the Octave Maintainers list to see if we want to
> diverge from the Matlab Java interface or not. It would be a
> superset of Matlab, but it still might create problems if
> people code to the Octave interface, say while working at home,
> and then bring it to work to simulate on Matlab.
This already happens and is not a problem. We have rows, columns, ishandle,
iscolormap, prepad, postpad, etc... We have ! for negation, and # for
comments. Octave users know there's functionality in Octave that is still
missing in Matlab.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?41239>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/