[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #42037] Missing function integral

[Rik]

Follow-up Comment #24, bug #42037 (project octave):

I think so.  Not only is quadcc faster than quadgk, because it is a compiled
function rather than an m-file, but it can readily handle non-smooth
integrands with weird discontinuities including NaNs.  If a user knows
something about the specifics of the integrand, such as it being smooth and
continuous, then they can choose the integrator that best suits the problem. 
But if you don't know anything about it, and only have a handle to the
function, you need an integrator that can handle strange behavior.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42037>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/