|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59076] subplot replaces previously created axes |
Date: | Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:59:54 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/85.0.4183.83 Safari/537.36 Edg/85.0.564.44 |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #59076 (project octave): I haven't tried your change yet. But it looks like it would do what I was imagining. I wonder if it would make sense to keep the old logic and add the new logic if the old one failed. Also it might be clearer to add an "all" around "size (rcn) == [1 3]" in the condition. I haven't tried that yet either. But is it possible that an axes looses its appdata somehow? IIRC, e.g. "plot" resets about everything in an axes if hold is "off". I wonder if there is a reason why Matlab chose to store that information in the axes' parent instead of in the axes itself. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59076> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |