[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #55570] quiver3 input validation should be tighter

[Nicholas Jankowski]

Update of bug#55570 (group octave):

                  Status:             In Progress => Fixed                  
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                 
           Fixed Release:                    None => 9.1.0 (current stable) 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #8:

I believe the issues here have been addressed in other reports that added more
input validation to the quiver functions. On the current stable branch all of
the examples in this report seem to fail with an appropriate error message or
at least a call to print_usage().  closing as fixed.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?55570>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/