[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2024 13:53:33 -0500 (EST) |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #65413 (group octave):
There is a similar request for improvement of the movXXX functions. These all
depend on a common function called movfun() which is an m-file. Promoting
movfun() to a C++ function to take advantage of fast for loops, while leaving
individual functions like movemean, movmax as m-files would be a good
architecture.
I think jwe's suggestion in comment #2 to have a similar architecture with a
pagefun() function that is called by m-files which do the work of validating
inputs and providing a place to put a docstring is a good one.
And yes, performance of for loops for these sorts of functions is very bad.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65413>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, anonymous, 2024/03/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, Rik, 2024/03/04
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, John W. Eaton, 2024/03/06
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, Nicholas Jankowski, 2024/03/06
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd,
Rik <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, anonymous, 2024/03/15
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, Nicholas Jankowski, 2024/03/15
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, John W. Eaton, 2024/03/15
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, Nicholas Jankowski, 2024/03/15
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65413] Missing function: pagesvd, anonymous, 2024/03/16