[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave 3.0
From: |
João Cardoso |
Subject: |
Re: Octave 3.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:28:01 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 21:47, Schloegl Alois wrote:
| In a recent mail, you ranked 10 features for the next stable release.
| I'd like to comment on two topics:
|
| * N-dimension array:
| For multivariate signal analysis, n-dim array are very important.
| (e.g. multivariate autoregressive parameters are a sequence of
| matrices; and repeations of multichannel recordings). I'm able to
| handle this type of data with the current octave (i.e.
| two-dimensional matrices) using some workarounds (e.g. see TSA/MVAR).
| For this reason, N-dimensional arrays are not an important topic. It
| is not crucial, if the implementation of N-dim is delayed. In the
| list, N-dim arrays can be moved further down to a less important
| position.
Of course each one priorities are different.
Recently I had to redirect someone for using Tela instead of Octave
because of N-dimension arrays.
Joao
- Re: Octave 3.0, (continued)
- Re: Octave 3.0, Paul Kienzle, 2003/02/22
- Re: Octave 3.0, Per Persson, 2003/02/22
- Re: Octave 3.0, Ole Jacob Hagen, 2003/02/23
- RE: Octave 3.0, Lippert, Ross A., 2003/02/24
- RE: Octave 3.0, Schloegl Alois, 2003/02/26
- Re: Octave 3.0,
João Cardoso <=