Re: int octave_value::numel (void) const;

[David Bateman]

According to John W. Eaton <address@hidden> (on 11/17/04):
> On 17-Nov-2004, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> | You also need the attached one line patch so that the "end" keyword 
> | will work correctly for types where numel() is not the same as
> | dims().numel()...
> 
> OK, I made this change and added the following comment:
> 
>   // We want numel = prod (size ()) here, so dont' use
>   // index_object->numel () as that may be different (it is
>   // the number of nonzero elements for sparse arrays).
> 
> Is that accurate?

Perfect :-)

D.

-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola CRM                                 +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary