Re: Cell support for deblank

[David Bateman]

Keith Goodman wrote:

> On 6/7/05, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
>  
>
> > cellfun is part of 2.9.x, in fact looking at
> >
> > http://www.octave.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/octave/src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/cellfun.cc?rev=1.2&sortby=date&view=log
> >
> > it has been present since the 2.9.0 tagged version...
> >    
>
> In that case, a "which -all" would be useful.
>
>  
>
> > > which cellfun
> > >      
> cellfun is the dynamically-linked function from the file
> /usr/local/libexec/octave/2.9.3/site/oct/i686-pc-linux-gnu/octave-forge/cellfun.oct
>
>  
The octave-forge version comes first in your path. Some of the 
octave-forge stuff is set to not build it it also existing in octave 
(bitand, etc), but not cellfun.cc.. Basically there'll be one more 2.1.x 
release of octave-forge and then all of the common stuff will be 
stripped and octave-forge simplified.. So there is no point in 
addressing this issue...

D.

--
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary