|
From: | Sebastien Loisel |
Subject: | Re: Handle graphics again |
Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:00:48 +0100 |
On 2/13/06, John W. Eaton < address@hidden> wrote:Ok, a real quick comment.OTOH, we seem to also be developing N implementaitons of the code that
manages the handle graphics data. I would much prefer to have Octave
manage this data in one consistent and mostly Matlab-compatible way.
I just looked at your tarball. I don't know if I'm shooting for the same thing as you, you tell me. I would like my code to be structured like yours, except that:
a) I don't want to parse gnuplot, so all the fprintf and fputs are replaced by calls to functions in oct files.
b) To reduce the number of such oct files, I was going to put all those things you're printing in a cell array, and then call one master C++ function that parses the cell array and displays the plot.
But otherwise,
c) The C++ function in question is not user-friendly and is as small as possible while allowing you to implement the full HG functionality.
Sebastien Loisel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |